It was noted during the meeting that the Library returns value to the community
through book, materials, and tool checkouts, programming, education, and services.
There is demand for even more programming and City operating funds are vital to the
essential services provided to the community. This would not be possible without
staff to run said programming.
Ms. Grant noted that, despite decreased staffing, grant funding has been steady
lately, especially for the Creation Space.
The Library is anticipating a 2% budget cut for FY 2024. Any budget cuts would go
into effect January 1, 2024. The Board of Estimates (BOE) meets on October 9, then
all will have a better idea of what the 2024 budget will look like.
At one point, the Library was receiving $5 million+ from City allocations. The
estimated City allocation in 2024 is $4,681,245.38 (down $95,535.62 from
$4,776,781.00 in 2023). For more than a decade, the Library has been doing more
with less, but has reached a tipping point. Ms. Grant stated that LPL is taking budget
cuts very seriously and that impacts to overall services and to the La Crosse
community are at the forefront of all budget considerations. She pointed to recent
survey data (part of Strategic Planning) that spells out the immense value community
members place on LPL programs and services. Ms. Grant stated that, in order to
sustain Library programs and services, LPL needs long-term solutions.
Council Representative Mac Kiel stated that right now the City Council is interested in
creative solutions. It was also noted that without long-term solutions, the LPL Board
will need to continue making budget cuts every year.
Ms. Grant presented three scenarios that could be used to meet the projected 2%
budget cut.
Considerations that went into these scenarios included short vs. long-term impacts,
alignment with the recently Board-approved Strategic Plan, impacts to overall
services and the community, and effects on Library staff.
Target reduction amount: $95,536
Option A: Eliminate or freeze ALL vacant positions. (This measure would save
$90,434.46 and cut 77 staff hours/week. Additional reduction would come from the
materials budget. This would impact service throughout the organization, not just the
currently under-staffed Circulation Department.) Impacts would include reduced
programming and outreach as well as increased strain on staff.
Option B: Intermittently furlough ALL staff and close all locations on those days. This
would amount to 7 closed days in the calendar year 2024 in which staff would not be
paid. Ms. Grant noted that this option puts the financial burden entirely on staff. If this
were a viable solution, intermittent closures would be once a month for 7 months
excluding summer. Based on past experience with closing the Library intermittently, it
is confusing and frustrating for patrons. This option does not align with commitment to
service or our goal of staff retention. It was mentioned that this option would
effectively reduce staff compensation in an amount that would cancel out step raises
for Library employees.
Option C: Permanently close South Branch (SCL) and reduce positions accordingly.
In closing the South Branch Library, LPL would lose one of the vacant positions
currently open, and reduce a half time custodial position to a quarter FTE. LPL would
save $43,774 in salary and benefits and $51,762 in non-personnel savings “year one”
(utilities, materials, repair and maintenance, automation at the branch). There would
be a higher level of savings in subsequent years (expiration of contracts, etc.). This
option allows LPL to keep the most staff without furlough and allows LPL to retain two